A SIMULATION
INVESTIGATION OF STUCCO CLADDING WALL SYSTEM
VAPOR TRANSPORT PERFORMANCE IN A COLD CLIMATE:
PHASE III: HYGROTHERMAL RESPONSE TO INTERIOR WATER SOURCES AND
THE DRYING POTENTIAL OF DRAINAGE PLANES
FINAL REPORT
| Principal Investigator: | Louise F. Goldberg, Ph.D
(Eng) Building Physics and Foundations Research Programs College of Design University of Minnesota. |
| Project Manager: | Steven Pedracine MN Lath and Plaster Bureau St. Paul, MN |
Date: February, 2007
Revision: B
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CERTIFICATION
The research described herein has been performed with funding provided by the Minnesota Lath and Plaster Bureau. While this support is gratefully acknowledged, the Principal Investigator assumes complete responsibility for the contents herein.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report is a sequel to the report describing phases I and II of the “Vapor
Transport Performance in a Cold Climate” research project. As such, it needs to
be read in conjunction with the previous report as descriptions of the
methodologies used, boundary conditions and other background information are not
repeated herein.
This report investigates the following two aspects of stucco cladding system
performance:
The hygrothermal impact on the wall system of an internal moisture source adjacent to the exterior surface of the water resistive barrier (WRB).
The potential of using an air gap between the WRB and the stucco as a means of drying internally wetted stucco and, in so doing, decoupling the stucco moisture source from the framing system.
The first aspect was studied using the WUFI-2D (version 2.1) simulation program
with all its attendant limitations as described in the phase I and II report.
Given these limitations, the internal moisture loading was accomplished by
setting the initial moisture content of the stucco adjacent to the WRB at a
saturated state at the beginning of the simulation year on July 1. The moisture
performance was inferred from the resulting relative humidity and moisture
content transient temporal profiles as well as from the annual performance
summary data used in Phases 1 and II.
The second aspect was studied using the computational fluid dynamics module of
the ALGOR finite element program. The velocity profiles within the air gap were
simulated as a function of gap width, top and bottom slot height as well as gap
configuration. Three gap configurations were investigated, namely a uniform
thickness extending over the full wall height; an extruded polystyrene layer at
the bottom of the wall on the interior side of the air gap; and, the same
configuration except with the insulation layer on the exterior side of the gap.
The simulations of a stucco wall system subject to a transient interior wetting
event show that this moisture loading yields a phenomenology that is different
from that which occurs with exterior only wetting events that were addressed in
phases I and II of this research. While the performance of the base stucco
system nominally is adequate under single event transient internal moisture
loading, the data indicate a cause for concern as to what could happen with
repeated transient internal moisture loading events. Decreasing the vapor
coupling between the wet stucco moisture source and the framing cavity (such as
replacing 2 layers of grade D building paper with one layer of no. 15 felt)
while not changing the rest of the system seems to improve the performance.
Increasing the coupling between the framing cavity (such as replacing a
warm-side polyethylene vapor retarder with a PA-6 membrane) improves the
hygrothermal performance in some respects while exacerbating it in others. Hence
implementing both of these modifications together offers the potential of
effectively managing internally wetted stucco systems. Taken as a whole, the
results do offer some clues as to possible mechanisms for field-observed
failures that often defy conventional forensic analysis (such as a patch of
sheathing mold in the center of a windowless wall).
Using a vented drainage gap of adequate width offers an alternative approach to
effectively decoupling the wetted stucco vapor source from the wall cavity
system that could be used with a warm side polyethylene vapor retarder. In
particular, a drainage gap with 12 in. of extruded polystyrene insulation
installed on its bottom interior face shows promise of yielding flow rates
adequate to achieve sufficiently robust drying of internally wetted stucco when
driven by horizontal temperature gradients alone. However, implementing such a
system is likely to engender strong resistance from the stucco community owing
to the complexities of achieving a structurally robust stucco system with a
relatively large (0.5- 1”) gap between the WRB and the stucco. Conversely,
however, current practice with drainage air gaps in the 1/8-1/4” range with
bottom slots (or weep screeds) only are not effective as ventilation planes and
it is erroneous to claim otherwise.
Download the full report: Final3-B.pdf